spot_img

Civic Capital in Italy: the case of the Arbereshe


Italian social scientists have often seized on the notion of civic capital to map the peninsula’s quirks, among which extraordinary rates of tax evasion feature highly.

One classic reading, inspired by Robert Putnam’s groundbreaking 1993 book “Making Democracy Work”, low civic capital in southern Italy has impeded modernization. In another, high civic capital endowments in the northern regions, home to communal pulsions since the middle ages, explain greater prosperity.

Italian social scientists have often seized on the notion of civic capital to map the peninsula’s quirks, among which extraordinary rates of tax evasion feature highly.

One classic reading, inspired by Robert Putnam’s groundbreaking 1993 book “Making Democracy Work”, low civic capital in southern Italy has impeded modernization. In another, high civic capital endowments in the northern regions, home to communal pulsions since the middle ages, explain greater prosperity.

One fine-grained analyses even suggests that civic capital militates against opportunistic behavior and allows for companies to grow larger, optimizing productivity. As is known, 80% of Italy’s economy is made up of small firms, most of which are undercapitalized and, while often flexible, also unable to participate in high value-added research and innovation processes.

The Bank of Italy, using a massive data set, bluntly demonstrates a causal link between civic capital – measured by voter turnout – and economic growth, although it hastens to note that the pattern was stronger in the postwar period and is currently petering out.

Meanwhile, anecdotal evidence abounds as to how autonomous provinces populated by linguistic minorities – such as German-speaking Alto Adige – tend to defy popular stereotypes that government is a futile task in Italy.

While mere mention of civic or social capital tends to evoke apopleptic images of sweetness and light, it should be noted that the scholar who introduced the concept, Pierre Bourdieu, was under no illusions, noting that social capital is what makes privileged cliques stick together. Indeed, the growth of xenophobic nationalism around Europe is a clear appeal to civic capital – albeit imagined as something to consolidate and close off rather than open and expand.

Clearly whether deep civic capital is good or bad depends on perspective and scale. Insofar as it enables trust over larger networks, it ought to be a desired attribute. Indeed, new research even detects a positive correlation between taxes and freedom! That ultimately tracks back to the idea that states that can actually levy high taxes tend to have good track records of delivery in their fiscal contract with citizens. Without such a track record, taxes are hard to collect and generate disgruntlement.

One frequent hope, especially among finance ministers, is that civic capital might be rapidly deployed. On top of that, the growing role of immigrants raises the question of how they can be integrated into the fabric of social cohesion.

Alas, it may not be so easy, according to Emanuele Bracco, Maria De Paola and Colin Green, three historians who seized an oft-forgotten event from 500 years ago to take the long view.

Italy’s Arbëreshë culture, they found, has a lot of civic capital, in particular as measured today in terms of voter turnout.

Questo contenuto è riservato agli abbonati

Abbonati per un anno a tutti i contenuti del sito e all'edizione cartacea + digitale della rivista di geopolitica

Abbonati ora €45

Abbonati per un anno alla versione digitale della rivista di geopolitica

Abbonati ora €20

- Advertisement -spot_img