Going Beyond East and West


It is undeniable that the world has been going through in these very last decades major changes and profound transformations which have been challenging the post-world war II international order.

 

It is undeniable that the world has been going through in these very last decades major changes and profound transformations which have been challenging the post-world war II international order.

 


The first driver at the basis of these changes has certainly been economic. The reduction of trade restrictions and falling costs of transport and communication, brought along through progressive trade liberalization promoted in the WTO framework by the Uruguay round, first, and the ongoing Doha Round then, has certainly boosted economic integration which has risen rapidly worldwide in these very last decades and which has gradually led to the emerging of new economies (which just back to two decades ago were considered as poor developing countries).

Indeed, we are assisting today to the rising of new economies (e.g. not only the BRICS countries, but also Turkey, South Korea, Indonesia, Nigeria etc.) – often referred to as “emerging economies”, in terms of their increase of share in the world GDP, per capita income, or trade – which are challenging the global leadership (especially of the economy) of the “West” (US+Western Europe) and demanding for more recognition and, especially, more leadership within it.

The numbers of course are more helpful than words to support these statements. Hence, if we look at how the share in the world GDP has been changing during these past decades (according to an FT study on it), we gather evidence for our thesis:

1) Between 1982 and 1987 the wealth between emerging and advanced economies was divided with 31% in the hands of emerging and 69% in the hands of the advanced economies. In this period while the U.S. had 29.8% of GDP, Japan 10.3%, Germany, the UK and Italy 10.6%, China had a 9.9% share and India 3.8%.

2) Ten years later, between 1992 and 1997, things changed and the share between the two hypothetical blocks underwent a first violent move. The U.S. share drops to 24.2%, Japan – in what is called its lost decade – moves down to 3.8%, while China moves up to 18.9%, India registers 6.1%, and Mexico and Indonesia arrive on the stage.

3) But it is only at the turn of the millennium, between 2002 and 2007, that we witness the first real shift of the balance in favour of emerging economies. The U.S. share drops to 12.6%, whereas China’s moves up to 23.6% and India’s to 7.7%. Japan and Western Europe continue their fall and Turkey surfaces with its 1.8%.

What as for future prospects?

The U.S. are expected to account for half of the share of advanced economies’ growth, whereas China’s share is predicted to reach 33.6% and account for half of emerging economies’ share of global growth. India will reach 9.4% and the MIST countries: Mexico 1.6%, Indonesia 2.4%, South Korea 1.8% and Turkey 1.35%.

Questo contenuto è riservato agli abbonati

Abbonati per un anno a tutti i contenuti del sito e all'edizione cartacea + digitale della rivista di geopolitica

Abbonati ora €45

Abbonati per un anno alla versione digitale della rivista di geopolitica

Abbonati ora €20

- Advertisement -spot_img

La variante sudafricana non esiste!

La Pop Art e la critica del sistema

Prezzi dell’energia: una politica per soluzioni durature

Usa, il Pentagono indaga sugli UFO

Autodistruzione imperiale