Towards a more United and Effective Europe: The Way Forward


The outcome of 2014 European elections is a call for change. New policies are necessary, a new strategy needs to be adopted.

The outcome of 2014 European elections is a call for change. New policies are necessary, a new strategy needs to be adopted.

On 25 May, 400 million European voters were called to polling stations to elect 751 members of the new European Parliament. This is the second most important democratic exercise on the planet, after the Indian elections. Beyond the figures, the 2014 European elections will be remembered as the first ever (they began in 1979) to offer voters the opportunity to have a say in the election of the President of the EU Commission, through their representatives in the European Parliament. They were also the first to show an increase – slight, but significant – in voter turnout, from 43% in 2009 to 43.09%.

In the central-eastern countries, Eurosceptic parties won a total of 45 seats (22% of the 199available) while in the ‘western’ countries they took 186 (33% of the 552 available).The media have emphasized gains of the so called eurosceptics across Europe, and it is undeniable that they have registered an increase of almost 10 percentage points, moving from 20% of the vote (156 seats) in 2009 to 30% (231 seats) this year. But I find that the key result in these elections – the first since the Eurozone economic crisis began – is that the four strongly pro-Europe pan-national parties (Christian Democrats, Socialists, Liberals and the Greens) successfully held their own. They have in fact secured 70% of the EU popular vote (520 seats). This is a clear sign that voters are opting for ‘more’, not ‘less’ Europe.

As underlined in the final report “Imaging Europe”, polarization, fragmentation and asymmetry have marked European dynamics causing an incomplete monetary union and a social-cultural and political division between northern and southern countries.

One of the most effective answers Europe gave to the crisis in the last years was the establishment of a European banking union, consisting of a single supervisory mechanism and a single resolution mechanism applying a single rulebook. After that (on 10 June) the 18 eurozone Member States reached a political understanding on the European Stability Mechanism’s (ESM) direct recapitalisation instrument – which is expected to be ready by November, i.e. when the European Central Bank takes on bank supervision – the completion of the Banking Union is closer. To complete this process, the setup of a European fiscal backstop – potentially in the form of a credit line from the ESM, which should be available to the Fund – is key. A European backstop is crucial to break the sovereign-bank toxic loop – which is one of the major goals of the banking union – and to strengthen the credibility of the whole banking union. In fact, what makes resolution authorities credible is the knowledge that, when private sector solutions do not suffice, they can draw on temporary public bridge financing, although as a last resort. This steadies expectations of markets and investors, and supports financial stability by showing the strong commitment of the banking union Member States against possible new crises.

Questo contenuto è riservato agli abbonati

Abbonati per un anno a tutti i contenuti del sito e all'edizione cartacea + digitale della rivista di geopolitica

Abbonati ora €45

Abbonati per un anno alla versione digitale della rivista di geopolitica

Abbonati ora €20

- Advertisement -spot_img

Marocco e Israele, ecco l’accordo sulla difesa

Nucleare: a Vienna riaprono i colloqui con l’Iran

La variante sudafricana non esiste!

La Pop Art e la critica del sistema